There is the question of whether a blog is the best way
to communicate or if some other social media would be better. I have been encouraged, more than I might
have expected from some quarters, that this is worth-while; but whilst some
posts get a lot of hits – some predictably because they mention
something/somebody well known, some for reasons I can’t quite fathom – others get
no more than a handful. The latter, I
think, say something worthwhile, otherwise I wouldn’t bother writing them but
it does make one question the use of the time needed.
So, is a blog the best way to communicate? If it is, there is the question of style and
content. If it continues, I will do my
best to make the style more accessible.
One or two people have said they find it difficult to understand. If that isn’t just about style then what about
the content? I have tried to pitch it as
a thoughtful and sometimes challenging comment on current economic and related
subjects from a Christian perspective.
It doesn’t aim to be academic because that’s not where I’m coming from
and not where I think the audience is but maybe it still assumes a level of understanding
of economics or other subjects that not everyone is comfortable with.
I’d be interested in comments, both constructive
criticism and well as any encouragement.
The aim is to inform and stimulate thought and perhaps debate across the
area of a Christian approach to economic matters, which is what I’m most interested
in, but also the wider issues connected with my work with Faith at Work in
Worcestershire and now the Committee for Agriculture and Rural Life. I look forward with interest to any feedback,
either through the comment button on the blog site or by email, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment