Friday 14 December 2012

Worcestershire Unemployment, and Earnings, November 2012

The figures and analysis about Worcestershire below are taken from the County Council’s December 2012 County Economic Summary.  This has been revised in format and to some extent content and I have taken what I think are the salient points, having in some places prĂ©cised them slightly.

Headline Figures
The claimant count in Worcestershire in November 2012 decreased by 203 to 10,114, 552 lower than the number of claimants in November 2011.  This is 2.9% of the 16-64 population, which remains below the regional and national levels. The greatest decrease in absolute terms (between November 2011 and November 2012) took place in Redditch and Worcester with a fall of 205 and 206 claimants respectively.

The urban centre with the highest proportion of claimants aged 16-64 is Kidderminster with 4.2% and the lowest proportion is in Wythall at 1.6%. In Worcestershire's urban areas the proportion of claimants aged 16-64 is 3.3%, which is 0.4% higher than the county as a whole.

After a significant rise (from around 1.5%), the Worcestershire claimant rate reached a peak in April 2009. Since the middle of 2010 the proportion of claimants has stabilised around 3.1%, with some seasonal effects related to Christmas and summer employment.

Long Term Unemployment
The proportion of claimants who have been receiving of Job Seekers Allowance between 6 and 12 months has decreased by 7.7 percentage points to 14.7% since November 2011. It is now the lowest that it has been since December 2010 but the proportion receiving JSA for more than 12 months has increased by 7.9 percentage points over the same period to 22.3% of all claimants.  The number of people claiming for 6-12 months has declined due to them either finding employment or falling into the category of claiming for more than 12 months.

If a person is unemployed for an extended period of time there is an increasing likelihood of them becoming disengaged from the labour market.

Claimants Leaving the Unemployment Count
2,435 people left the claimant count in November 2012, of those people 46.2% have found employment and a further 40.9% are either 'not known' or have 'failed to sign'; it is possible that some of these people have also found employment.

Youth Unemployment Claimants Aged 18-24
In October 2012 the number of claimants aged 18-24 was 2,875 which is a decrease of 135 compared to October 2012 and 340 fewer compared to November 2011. The proportion of claimants aged 18-24 is 6.9%, the same as the England average but below the West Midlands average (8.7).

The districts with the highest proportion of claimants aged 18-24 were Redditch (7.9%) and Wyre Forest (8.5%), the greatest decrease in absolute terms (between November 2011 and November 2012) took place in Redditch with a fall of 160 claimants.  The figures for individual wards are no longer so easily available but I am happy to find them should anyone want them.

After a significant rise, the Worcestershire 18-24 claimant rate reached a peak in August 2009 though it has since fallen with some seasonal effects related to Christmas and summer employment; however it is yet to reach pre-recession levels.  It is important to reduce the number of 18-24 year olds in unemployment, as it affects people at the very start of their working lives. A period of unemployment at this stage increases the likelihood of an individual becoming disengaged from the labour market and impacting their lifetime earnings potential.

National Picture
For information about the national picture see the BBCreport here.  This shows that Worcestershire broadly follows the national picture, though we are generally in a better position. However, one should never overlook those places that are more significantly impacted and the effect on individuals wherever they are.

The BBC’s Economics Editor, Stephanie Flanders, has an interesting analysis of the national figures here.  One would hope that there has been some pre-Christmas hiring (which may well be temporary) and this may be contributing to improved figures and sentiment.  On the other hand, as Flanders points out, comparing the July to September quarterly unemployment figures with the June to August figures rather than the April to June figures shows the fall in unemployment is much lower and may be reflected in the claimant count figures which tend to be more sensitive.  Not wishing to throw too much cold water on the headline good news, one also notes that the OBR are predicting unemployment to rise to 8.2% before falling at some point in the cycle (as compared with 7.8% now) so a reverse of the trend is on the cards at some point.

Earnings
Flanders also makes the point about lower real earnings and I saw elsewhere attention drawn to a speech on 12 December given by Spencer Dale, Chief Economist at the Bank of England, who notes the “extraordinary flexibility” shown in the labour market. Real wages, measured in terms of consumer prices, have fallen by over 15% compared with the pre-crisis trend. So “no wonder that people are finding life tough”.  Many of us have had below inflation pay-rises, but for those who are underemployed in the current terminology (i.e. are working less or in poorer paid jobs than they would like) are the ones most affected by this trend.  Declining productivity in the economy (i.e. taking more people to produce goods that used to be the case) may be a worry for economists and perhaps for the economy of the country in the long-term if the trend is not reversed, but it has a very direct impact on the individuals affected in the present.  Dale also says:  “The harsh but inescapable reality of these developments – and the real adjustments they necessitate – is that households and families in our economy are worse off. Much worse off.” “The less we produce” and the less “we can purchase using the proceeds from our domestically produced output”, “the less we can ultimately consume”.  It is a matter of judgement whether the trade-off of some or maybe many people taking a cut in earnings is better than the higher unemployment that has been seen in previous recessions.  And the longer the debts, both private and public takes to unwind so that the longer the recession lasts the harder these effects become for the people affected.